On the 18th of August, 1903, Dorothy Edwards was born in the mining community of Ogmore Vale in southern Wales, to Edward and Vida, who met when he was a headmaster and she a teacher in the Tynewydd Infants and Juniors Mixed School.
Dorothy’s fiction is an ironic choice for #ReadingWales however, as she’s known for her English settings. And I should have known this, because last year I read her short stories in Rhapsody (1927), but I’d loved the stories so much I couldn’t wait to read Winter Sonata (1928).
I’d planned to only glance at the stories, but I reread them after all. (This happened to me with another novel recently, too, and I’m trying to pay more attention to reading moods, to fall into certain rereads when I feel the pull.) And because I still remembered many of them rather well, I studied to see what made them so appealing for me.

What I’ve said before, is the way in which Edwards focuses on solitary-and-sometimes-melancholy characters, how she inhabits these men and women so that she can make observations that feel cool and true, but without sacrificing all the warmth, so that we also feel for them.
And most often we feel a sort of sympathy for them, for their small (and large) disappointments (and sorrows). But there are also moments of joy and comfort. Often, as you would guess from the titles, via music: played or heard. But also as they move through landscapes—though sometimes those too can be stormy—or read a book or peer through a particular window or spend an evening in conversation.
There are often plants and trees throughout the stories (so many trees in Winter Sonata, their shading altered slightly as the season unfolds), and a queer way of knitting ideas of growth and stagnation.

They are not predictable stories and not like other stories I associate with the turn of the last century. There is something both rhythmic but disruptive about the stories’ endings, and these secure my interest.
As here: “We put the tree in. I have never heard whether it grew or not. Just as the sun was rising we walked back, and that morning I went away.”
And you might think, from that, she’s a spare and concise stylist, but her language shifts to mirror the narrators. So consider this other ending, where the phrases unfurl, outward from only talk of awkwardness to a swell of emotion:
“Of course it was all very awkward for him, and it is not easy to fit in exactly with a young girl’s ideas of life, for it is for her still very much like a fairy tale, and yet it seems a pity that something so very like a flower, like a young rose, you know, should have to cry all night.”
In another mood, I think I could find these endings dissatisfying, annoying even. But if I have been in that sort of mood when I picked up her collection, she pulled me into her orbit so tidily that I was ready for them.
Winter Sonata fits with the stories in the sense that there is a similar simplicity and loneliness to Arnold Nettle’s life, as he works in the post office. (In Claire Flay’s study of DE’s work, she highlights that this is the first time DE’s own working-class background features in her work—her other characters live more leisurely, practice their instruments and study their translations.)
His shifts end at 6 and, mostly, he returns to his (boarded) room, spends his evenings playing his cello. There are two children in the home and the oldest, Pauline, sneaks out to hang with the boys at choir practice, and gets back into the house via Nettle’s part of the house, to remain undetected by her mother. (Pauline’s mother isn’t fooled—she says nasty things about Pauline and slaps her around; nobody gets hit in Rhapsody—although husbands cheat on their wives and wives dream of cheating on their husbands—but working-class life is rough, judgements harsh.)
Soon, however, Nettle comes to spend more time in another household, which is where the story truly launces. And by that , I mean there are some conversations and misunderstandings, and there is talk of love and evidence of both optimism and disappointment. This is a quiet sort of story, even though some of the characters are coming to profound realisations about what it means to live a good life, to decipher whom to trust, and to find a place you belong (when you haven’t been to many places at all).
Claire Flay’s study of Dorothy Edwards was fabulous reading alongside these two volumes. There are some letters about her family life (though, even there, very little about Wales itself), and the letter found in her pocket, after she’s been found dead, is also reproduced. It is heart-breaking, and even more so when Flay notes the instances in which certain elements had been echoed in her published work over the years.

It’s also interesting to learn about how difficult she had found it, simply to arrange the circumstances in which she could write a little. And to learn how it was for her, when David Garnett “discovered” her (he called her the Welsh Cinderella), triumphed her work, and introduced her to the Bloomsbury Group (he’d had higher hopes, and it seems she had too).
The essays by Elaine Morgan that introduce the Virago Modern Classic editions contain biographical information, but Flay’s work is much more detailed, and there are a few pages of glossy photographs too. DE did keep a diary, so there are excerpts from that, although the bulk of the book is about her writing.

One unexpected connection emerged with talk of how DE was influenced by classic stories, including the Demeter and Persephone myth, as well as The Mabinogion, which I’d just begun reading in Charlotte Guest’s translation. Bill has written about this as well, with a focus on “Kilhwch and Olwen” (I’ve not gotten to this tale yet, as I’m reading one every few days).
Flay points out a passage in Winter Sonata where a character out walking describes the experience of never nearing a young girl also out for a walk ahead—“I felt as though some wicked fairy was keeping the distance between us always the same”—and quotes the corollary from the tale about Pwyll, prince of Dyfed, in the first branch of these ancient Celtic tales. It’s always wonderful when stories seem to knit together like this (though I was disappointed not to have noticed even the allusion to the myth I did know!).
My favourite detail was to learn of the care that Edwards paid to Winter Sonata, to the way it developed from the germ of an idea (captured in another letter), the way it seems like Nettle found neighbours for his own self, even as Edwards was writing into the darkness with him.
And, most curiously, her delicate use of repetition. There are snippets of phrases, echoes of observation, that appear throughout the novel (just over 200 pages long, with generous margins and font) at intervals, in just the way that musical phrases reappear during a sonata.
Thanks to Karen for hosting #ReadingWales this month and encouraging us to read more widely; she’s joined by Kathryn this year. Shout-out to the previous host, Paula, who hosted when I had ready access to a larger library system with more contemporary Welsh authors in their collection.
You have certainly intrigued me with this author whom I didn’t know, but you won’t be surprised to hear that your description of her writing makes her feel right up my alley. I particularly like the idea of “disruptive endings”. The example you give is quite delicious and has me wondering.
BTW I strongly resist mood reading because although it would satisfy the emotional part of my reader-brain it would distress the responsible part that says I have made commitments to read this or that (to my reading group, for a start, but also to publishers, authors, and so on – not that I keep up with those commitments, so why do I worry?)
I think you would enjoy the psychological side to her stories and how much room she affords her characters to “muse” on disappointments and possibilities in romantic relationships.
That’s not something that complicates it for me, because I am often in that mood, a more focussed or student-ish mood, so those books just naturally get their turn. But I do know what you mean.
As another guard, I also have a schedule of sorts at the bottom of my regular calendar (sometimes more detailed than others) so that key reads aren’t overlooked when my stack gets unruly. But I realise this is… not normal. /chuckles
Love the “schedule of sorts” at the bottom of your calendar Marcie. I have two “schedules of sorts” – one is my reading group schedule and the other is the chronological list of review copies. I used to read that last conscientiously from oldest to newest, but recently, dare I say it, I have let a bit of mood creep in (which might be related to a book recently shortlisted, for example, so the sort of mood you talk about rather than an emotional mood.)
Mine might be too uncomfortably detailed for you as, at the bottom of each day, I note where my bookmark should be in a certain volume if I hope/must finish reading by a certain date. So I just started reading Alexis Wright’s Tracker, which I want to have finished at the end of April, so I have done the math to figure how much I need to read each day in order to reach that goal. The “of sorts” comes in because I don’t necessarily read it each day, but “sort of” follow the math.
I’ve commented on another reading wales post saying the same thing, but I’ll say it again for emphasis here – I love the reading with Wales logo, it’s so cute! That little dragon always catches my eye 🙂
I have to be in a special mood read these ‘quiet’ stories. I find when the whether is crummy outside, I like to immerse myself in those subtler writings, it feels very soul searching to be doing so in the rain or snow haha
It is really cute, I agree! Although I don’t exactly know if dragons are more Welsh than not. heh
This kind of quiet story just doesn’t seem to fit with your recent reading at all! Quite the opposite really.
I don’t think I’d heard of Edwards (when I saw your post title I had her confused with Dorothy Richardson). I’m currently reading an updated tale from the Mabinogion by Tishani Doshi.
That series of retellings is loosely on my TBR, a small part of my reason for reading the original.
Many thanks for this, Marcie. I’m going to look out for Dorothy Edwards in the second-hand / charity shops as she sounds right up my street. Quiet stories about life’s small sorrows, disappointments and dashed dreams are very much my things, but it’s reassuring to hear there are some brighter moments here too.
Given Mme Bibi’s response, I’m thinking it might be best to read the stories first (if you find both those and the novel). Of course I can’t exactly imagine what it would have been like to read them in the opposite order, but I think I might have felt as she did. Perhaps like reading ET’s Palladian before reading Angel (but Winter Sonata is nothing like Paladian).
The Mabinogion I only know because you introduced me to it, Dorothy Edwards I don’t know at all. But even if I am not often tempted to read short stories, I enjoyed a post devoted to one author – her work and her bio. Because I like looking at trends and connections my question would be how does her work fit with that of her Modernist contemporaries, the older, but fellow working class DH Lawrence for instance?
It’s the Bloomsbury group all over, no mention of Lawrence, and she seems to have, hmmm annoyed? disappointed?, her main supporter by not properly participating when in their company. Given what she would have perceived as massive privilege, I can see where she wouldn’t have felt comfortable in that scene, and probably would have hesitated to explain to him why that was (given his own privilege). On his part, he must have become aware, because he created an opportunity for her where she could have some time to write, but that soured eventually. Turgenev is mentioned in one short story, so I wonder if she was most interested in the Russians> Maybe even referencing Lawrence would have felt too risky, when she had already struggled to connect with the Woolfs etc.?
The little of Virginia Woolf I remember reading could easily be characterised as snobbish, so I could see Edwards no fitting in with that lot at a personal level.
Reading moods are definitely something to pay attention to.
Dorothy Edwards is just a name to me–I’ve never read anything by her. She sounds like I should. I find the Mabinogion pretty great.
I’m almost certain not to get anything read for Reading Wales this month unless I get very, very organized very soon. Which is too bad.
I’m in a bad habit of always prioritising my schedule, and trying to un-learn that (just sometimes).
As far as those early stories go, I am finding it much more accessible than I’d thought. Further incentive is the number of related series that I’ve had on my TBR forever without really considering the original.
The reading year is speeding along: I assume you are also keeping #1961Club in mind too… likely scads of options for you there, even in classic crime alone!
I’ve made a list for 1961! But that’s as far as I’ve gotten…
Same. Does A House for Mr. Biswas happen to be on your list?
I’ve read A House for Mr. Biswas, so I almost certainly won’t reread it. Biswas is still OK Naipaul as far as I’m concerned–he gets so sour later on.
I’ve got a copy of John Hawkes’ The Lime Twig that I’ve never read. Maybe! What’s on your list? Are you thinking Mr. Biswas?
Something like that has lodged in my mind, too, although all I ever read was a collection of his letters (and I would have lacked context, at that time too, and have long forgotten the other letter-writer). But I found a fair second-hand copy of Mr. B. with the Gissing novels, so decided to try again.
Hawkes looks very interesting: I’ve not read him, but there are many that intrigue me (via the TPL catalogue). Entertaining Dinesen’s Shadows on the Grass and Fuentes’ The Good Conscience (depending on whether ILL is possible), but also have some kids books in mind. Maybe a reread of Pym’s NFRofL which I remember as a favourite.
I find I’ve actually read Shadows on the Grass–it’s in one volume with Out of Africa for me, which I read back when the movie came out. I really liked the volume as a whole, but I can’t separate out Shadows on the Grass any more in my mind. The Fuentes looks like it could be fun, but I don’t know it at all. I’ve yet to read Artemio Cruz.
There will be something fun!
I didn’t completely love Winter Sonata when I read it, but it could have been the wrong time. I’d definitely like to pick up Rhapsody, and Flay’s study sounds an excellent way of improving my understanding.
I think if I had read it “on its own”, I’d’ve felt the same way; my enjoyment resides (I think? just typing out loud?) with seeing the novel as resonating with the stories–it all feels connected–and how there were clues in WS to what she longed for her own self (as a woman, as a daughter, as a friend, as a romantic partner) scattered throughout both volumes. And the relationship between the two younger girls left me a bit puzzled until I started thinking about the links Flay offers to mythology. (The Flay bio is one I ordered when I HAD to find Douglas Bruton…and that was, at least, partly your fault! hee hee)
Such an interesting post! Edwards is one of those writers whose books I’ve had on the TBR for ever but she definitely sounds worth reading!