So many books to talk about! Including what’s currently in my stacks and what I’m reading with this year’s reading about writing.
Spring and summer reading: something for every readers. Historical fiction? Michelle Butler Hallett’s This Marlowe. Families unravelling? Catherine Cooper’s White Elephant. Fiction unravelling? Malcolm Sutton’s Job Shadowing. Cookbooks? Gwyneth Paltrow’s It’s All Easy. Mystery? Susan Philpott’s Blown Red. History: James Laxer’s Staking Claims to a Continent.
Casting a spell on girlhood: Joni Murphy’s Double Teenage. Mining it for laughs: Jessi Klein’s You’ll Grow Out of It. Just trying to survive it: Karen Molson’s The Company of Crows. Adding a splash of scent: Lisa Moore’s Flannery. With fruit-filling: Jane Hamilton’s The Excellent Lombards.
There’s talk of backlisted fiction too, like Sky Lee’s Disappearing Moon Cafe and Helen Oyeyemi’s The Icarus Girl. On that score, I’m currently reading Ernest J. Gaines’ A Gathering of Old Men, Robert Alexie’s Porcupines and China Dolls, Toni Cade Bambera’s The Salt Eaters, Jesmyn Ward’s Men We Reaped and Grace Lin’s The Year of the Dog.
And I’m looking forward to my next Toni Morrison, some Philip Pullman and more Guy Gavriel Kay (it’s been too long).
How about you: what are you reading these days, and what are you looking forward to reading soon?
(First time here? Please don’t be shy: there’s no such thing as too much bookchat! Please leave a comment, say hello, talk books!)
It begins with something extraordinary.
“Almost a decade earlier, a man with a .45-70 Marlin hunting rifle walked through the front doors of Avalon Hills prep school. He didn’t know that he was about to become a living symbol of the age of white men shooting into crowds.”
House of Anansi. 2016
Readers are immediately alerted to the idea of a threat which can burst into an everyday scene. Something as alarming as a man with a high-powered weapon, erupting into a school hallway, seeking revenge.
But there is another man, too, who tackles him, sparking a “graceless pas de deux of grappling, the gun discharged an aimless bullet”.
The gunman is not presented as inhuman. He has challenges; he faces some of them down in a more reasonable fashion, but others have brought him to the edge of violence, to this school hallway.
But when he sees Sadie in front of her locker, in the hallway, he consciously acknowledges that he is not a killer-of-children.
Although he might have been a killer-of-a-girlfriend, except he is interrupted.
First, by the presence of the girl, but then by George Woodbury, the prep-school science teacher who tackles him. In this scenario, George is a hero.
“He was a fixture in town. He remained the man from Woodbury Lake who’d saved the children.”
And the book is about The Best Kind of People. So readers will expect it to be about George.
“Say the words wealthy and Protestant and picture a family. That’s them, or close enough.”
And, it is. But now? It’s a decade later.
George’s role is about to change dramatically.
“No one saw it coming.”
Two plainclothes detectives and several uniformed officers come to the door.
Against a backdrop of flashes of red and blue through the open windows, “a light show for the symphony of cicadas”, George is cuffed in the foyer.
“Sexual misconduct with four minors, attempted rape of a minor. The words didn’t make sense.”
And none of this is extraordinary.
The most unsettling bit of all – how ordinary it is.
How often is there a gap between what we expected and what transpired: it happens all the time.
True, the gap between the George Woodburys is a sizeable gap. One, devoted father, who tackled an armed gunman to the floor, while his daughter (yes, that girl in the hallway was his daughter – Sadie); the other, George Woodbury, accused rapist.
Sadie attends school with these girls, the victims/accusers. One of them is the younger sister of Sadie’s good friend, Amanda. One of them. Because it is now a question of ‘them’ and ‘us’.
Whether an instinctive understanding of vulnerability or a contrary perversity fuelled by hormones, Sadie does not automatically assume her father is innocent. Wife (and mother), Joan, falls solidly into the role of loyal helpmeet and supporter. Andrew, the older son who has lived away from home for some time, puts his legal training to work and aims for neutrality, while following courtroom protocol to support his father’s case.
This is skillful plotting on Zoe Whittall’s part, allowing her to explore several positions on the spectrum, while the question of George’s guilt/innocence is examined, formally and informally. (And the pacing and language conspire so that every scene seems to probe into dark corners, creating the sense that, at any moment, someone could drag some torn bit of truth into the spotlight.)
As the story develops, this might have become a courtroom drama, but that’s not the intent of The Best Kind of People, in which the injured and the personal acts of betrayal/reparation which play out on the most intimate levels.
“She didn’t automatically trust anyone anymore. Trust was now something that required an extra beat, a moment of consideration.” (So many characters might have this thought: leaving it unattributed avoids spoilers.)
House of Anansi, 2009
Whether or not there is adequate evidence to dismiss/exonerate/convict is less important than how the people closest to George respond to the evidence, how they cope in the absence of evidence, how they perceive the need for it for themselves and for others.
And how one lives their ordinary life, while all of these questions loom: that’s perhaps most important of all.
“They’d been back at school for one week. Their senior year in high school at Avalon prep had begun with aplomb. They were both in the accelerated stream, their sights set on prestigious universities, afternoons filled with student government meetings, sporting events, community volunteer hours, making out between the rows of woody ancient texts inhe school library. The week had been busy and thus ordinary. This was the last weekend that anything would feel normal until they were halfway through college.”
In this context, busy is equated with ordinary.
When one’s father/husband is arrested, time slows. There is nothing to do but wait. Wait for a verdict, wait for a resolution, wait for permission to move on.
Readers know from the beginning that this will happen, at least for Sadie. Even in this early passage, only one week after the arrest, readers are assured that things will eventually feel normal for Sadie. Just as they did after the gunman entered those school halls. Now she is in her senior year and nothing feels ordinary, but by the time she is halfway through college, she will feel that again.
What readers do not yet know is what happens in those two years, what transpires to restore a sense of normalcy in her life.
The Best Kind of People is preoccupied with that waiting period, although it does not chart the entire timeline.Throughout, there are small shifts in perception and understanding, and broader experiences of underlying issues (trust and acceptance, authority and betrayal, disregard and denial, consent and vulnerability, isolation and care-taking). So while the narrative displays the quotidien (who is sitting outside the neighbourhood coffee shop and the number of times someone gets high), the complexity brewing beneath is ever-in-motion.
Peripheral family members dart into and settle into spheres of influence, as the crisis unfolds: relationships bloom and recede in the face of pressure. In George’s absence, gaps between other characters narrow and widen, raising other questions about intimacy and loyalty. Members of Sadie’s boyfriend’s family are key in her struggle to reorient herself. Even the minor characters have agency (and opinions).
In her prior novel, Holding Still for as Long as Possible, Zoe Whittall’s character Billy observes: “The more strangers think they know who you are, the less you feel you know yourself. Or worse, you might believe them.”
This concept is at play in The Best Kind of People too: the line between knowing and believing will not hold still.
So many questions are raised in the narrative, about sexuality, agency, independence, identity, responsibility, compassion, respect, authenticity, and, of course, justice.
Very ordinary questions. Very hard questions.
In which I discuss some of the skinny volumes, which have nestled into my bookbag.
(Meanwhile longer works, like Kathleen Winsor’s Forever Amber and Greg Iles’ The Bone Tree, were left at home.)
Patricia and Fredrick McKissack’s Best Shot in the West tells the story of Nat Love, who was born into slavery in 1854 and became a renowned African-American cowboy.
The volume is arranged in a series of short tales, as though Nat Love has responded to a request to write his memoirs. In fact, his autobiography was published in 1907, The Life and Aventures of Nat Love, Better Known in the Cattle Country as ‘Deadwood Dick’. But it wasn’t illustrated by Randy Duburke!
The illustrations are in pale, watery tones and predominantly black-white-grey at first, as the story begins in Denver, Colorado in 1902, where Nat is working as a railway porter.
But when he begins to consciously remember the experiences of his earlier days, dating to childhood on a plantation in Davidson County, Tennessee, his memories are often boldy and brashly tinted.
There are only a few panels on each page, affording plenty of room for background figures and shading to establish scenes and atmosphere, and frequently entire pages contain only a single illustration.
There is some dialogue but the information is largely shared in textboxes of narrative which summarize not only his personal experiences but also general information relevant to the life of a man employed as a cattle driver and roper.
“Shortly after I joined Gallinger’s outfit, we got an order to move 2,500 head of three-year-old-steers to Dodge City. It was the largest drive I’d ever been a part of. We left with 40 men and two months of provisions.”
A contemporary of Bat Masterson and Billy the Kid, there is a lot of talk of adventure and outlaw life, and most of the scenes explored in detail here are rooted in tension or conflict, which makes for engaging reading.
If John Wayne is the only cowboy you know, the McKissacks’ graphic book is an excellent reminder that life in the Old West was colour-filled indeed.
(And, if you’re looking to really shake up your ideas of Cowboys’N’Indians, Thomas King’s novel Green Grass, Running Water is a fantastic – and oh-so funny – place to start!)
Thani Al-Suwaidi’s The Diesel is a perfect candidate for several categories in this year’s BookRiot Reading Challenge.
It’s set in the Middle East, it features a transgender character, and it’s under 100 pages in length. (See challenge here.)
In an interview with al-Jazeera in 2004 (quoted in the introduction by W.M. Hutchins, who also translated the work from the Arabic), the author acknowledged that his novel had “shocked some readers with its frank portrayal of the behavior of homosexuals in the Arabian Gulf region but said that the novel’s theme is the effect of the petroleum age of a small community torn between two cultures”.
He speaks of depicting “a world heading for a collision, a world that many in the Gulf region have worked to conceal”.
He’s referring, Hutchins explains, not only to sexual “desire and a rebellion against dichotomous, patriarchal gender assignments, but also to popular culture, superstitions and magic”.
There are scenes in the novel which unfold in the mosque, but there are many others which take place outside, which have a strange disorienting sense of unfolding elsewhere, in an untethered place, which feels familiar but is removed from the everyday. (The book might also count in BookRiot’s challenge for one which considers religion.)
Majid Nur al-Din states that the structure is “deliberately disjointed to present the contemporary Arab experience in a portrait that reflects a self that is split between an image of the past and an image of the consumer-oriented present”.
When he becomes The Diesel, when he makes people dance and seemingly escape the confines of their less satisfying lives, simultaneously cloying and draining, he appears to contain and offer an irresistible alternative to joyless living.
Dr. Fatima Ahmad Khalifa explains that Thani Al-Suwaidi “personifies place and breathes his spirit into it so that place, time, history, and the character constitute a single whole that is agitated and alarmed by what happens”.
For me, this novella reads like poetry. At the sentence-level, there are some beautiful passages which often require rereading, and as W.M. Hutchins knows the text intimately, I suspect this is a reflection of the original narrative.
One has the sense of being removed from what is known, dangled from some aerial structure by the toes, one’s fingertips never quite brushing the surface of what’s unfolding on the page below. It’s not a comfortable feeling; rather, a curious one.
What are you slipping into your bookbag this week?
If a story’s beginning looks at its reflection in a room made of mirrors, does it see its own beginning-self reflected back? Or is the reflection actually the story’s ending?
Hamish Hamilton, 2016
This is the kind of question that I can imagine keeps Jay Hosking up late at night. The characters in Three Years with the Rat are similarly preoccupied.
Consider the friend who asks the narrator of the novel “Beginning of the end or end of the beginning?”
Of course, he’s actually asking about the young man’s relationship with his girlfriend, Nicole. Which is strained and waning. But it’s important overall: where things start, where they stop, and the amount of time which elapses between starting and stopping.
Circularity is humming throughout the novel. Wide arcs connect characters and timeframes, memories and geography. However, just as with the question posed above, readers can rely upon solid characterization and an investment in a handful of voices to pull them through the narrative.
Structurally, readers can rely upon the calendar to root them as well. The novel is divided into August, September, October, November and December.
But, wait: it’s not that simple. The August section contains, for instance, 2008 and 2007 and 2006. In fact, each of the months contains glimpses of these three years. From ending to beginning, from 2008 back to 2006.
Readers might want to draw a straight line for the chronology of months, to join these parts of the story, to feel something concrete beneath the narrative. (I imagine this line drawn in thick, water-proof, black, chisel-tipped magic marker.)
But they also would have to draw other connections., so the 2006 segment of the December chapter near the end of the book, could be connected to the 2006 segment of the August chapter, which is near the beginning. (I imagine these lines drawn with those skinny little markers you buy at art stores, in a variety of bright colours.)
And so on, and so on. Except, not so much so-on-and-so-on. Because the essential element of this novel is disconnection, not connection. Readers no sooner settle into a month and year, which is scenically drawn and filled with emotional and sensory detail, when their attention to directed to another layer in the reflection.
While the plotting is tight and solid (readers could read all the 2006 sections together, for instance, instead of moving through the pages sequentially), nothing else feels firm here.
The characters are young and searching, students in university, inhabiting laboratories and bars with equal dedication. Questions outnumber answers in both scenarios.
“Man up or suck it up, Danger. Commit to something or stop your maudlin pity party. You can make your choice or you can have it taken away from you again.”
When and how to act: this is an underlying concern, both at the everyday and ordinary level (whether to keep a job which is clearly dissatisfying) and the bizarre and extraordinary (whether to travel through time).
And, then, there is the matter of sorting out what one can trust and what is possible (whether a relationship brings out the best in you), from what is illusory and inconceivable (whether you can control the subjective nature of time to move yourself through your past-present-future).
Early in the novel, a mystery is presented. “There was something in it, not a lie exactly but not the truth. He had faltered. He knew something about Grace but he didn’t think it would help me.”
When Grace disappears (and, later, her boyfriend, John, disappears), the narrator begins by asking the kinds of questions you think one would ask if someone disappears.
But before page 100, readers understand that there is another set of questions which must be addressed.
“Just imagine you could be the past and the present and the future you, all at the same time,” she said. “Imagine you had full access. Imagine you knew everything was going to work out, or even if it wasn’t going to work out, at least you’d be ready for that’s coming. The things you could tell yourself.”
This is Grace speaking. Readers understand that her disappearance is not the average girl-goes-missing story.
Furthermore, Grace is not an average girl. She is above-average smart. But she understands that readers (and some other characters) do not engage with the world in the same way she does.
She takes time to explain her studies to her brother and uses language that readers can understand.
“If objective time is a one-dimensional arrow, maybe subjective time is a two-dimensional wave. Or a three-dimensional spiral. Maybe clocks are only measuring that movement in one dimension, its length, but our brains are sensing our depth and width through time.”
Here, you can begin to see that diagram of the novel’s structure (the one I was drawing with magic markers above, fat and skinny lines, dark and bright colours) pointing and waving and spiralling.
(The jacket compares this novel to Mark Danielewski’s House of Leaves. This makes sense: I think of the pages in that book in which the narrative takes place in the margins, the way that the actual story gets displaced, forcing readers to read blank pages and grapple with a shape that is constantly shifting, a story that loses its centre before it begins. But it seems to have a closer resemblance to a book like Kjersti A. Skomsvold’s The Faster I Walk the Smaller I Am, which also plays with science-y ideas and time in particular, but is truly concerned with connections between people and the question of absence and presence. Or Benjamin Constable’s The Three Lives of Tomomi Ishikawa, which is also about a disappearance, but less sciencey and is more about securing a relationship by solving a series of puzzles and following clues left behind.)
But not-so-science-y readers need not fear. Those who are super curious could turn to Claudia Hammond’s 2012 work, Time Warped: Unlocking the Mysteries of Time Perception, and delve into the psychology and neuroscience that simmer beneath the novel’s surface.
Yet, Three Years with the Rat is ulimately about relationships, and not just the relationship between one’s subjective and objective experiences of time, but family and love relationships.
Ultimately it is about whether or not we can connect in those relationships, whether acts which resulted in our disconnecting from ourselves (painful things, haunting things, puzzling things) mean that we are left unable to draw lines between ‘us’ and ‘them’.
Whether, as the years pass (or, as we force them to pass or to un-pass, whether we move backwards or forwards) we can thrive (or, survive).
“Oblivion is the annihilation of the self. Grace was looking for the opposite, a way to remove everything but the self.”
How do we make ourselves? What happens when all that is left is the un-making?
Is there a way to get back to the beginning, when the ending is just too much?
Sometimes I buy books for the stories on their pages; sometimes I buy them for the stories between the pages.
My copy of Porcupines and China Dolls was purchased second-hand at the Trinity College booksale more than ten years ago.
Because of a handful of folded sheets tucked inside the back cover (although, yes, I was freshly in love with Thomas King’s writing and on the lookout for other aboriginal authors).
Some correspondence between a potential reviewer and two different publishers, an inner-office memo, a copy of a very positive review of the book which appeared online in a regional newspaper, and the reviewer’s handwritten notes.
For the price of $5, could I understand why a reviewer who was writing for an Anglican church publication was so eager to get a copy of this book, which explores the abusive practices of the residential schools staffed by the Anglican church?
The horrors, general and specific, perpetrated upon residential-school students are now well-documented.
But the publication of Porcupines and China Dolls falls after Tomson Highway’s Kiss of the Fur Queen but before Richard Wagamese’s Indian Horse.
The sociopolitical impact of the residential school system didn’t/doesn’t commonly appear on the pages of literary novels; I wouldn’t have thought that discussion of the abuse perpetrated by church officials would have commonly appeared in Anglican church publications either.
Whether or not the reviewer did ultimately cover Robert Arthur Alexie’s book remains uncertain. Her notes stop with a remark for page 68: “getting monotonous”.
Admittedly, it was. Monotonous, I mean. So many nights spent drinking. Men in the bar, taking women home, where they drink more. They wake up hurting, pry themselves through the day, head back to the bar.
Beyond page 68, the binding of this hardcover feels tight; it’s hard to imagine that anyone read beyond, until I did.
Which is a shame. Because the root of the monotony, the tedium, the horror of inescapable memories isn’t yet clear at that point in the story.
“He wished he could shoot all his dreams.
Just put the gun in your mouth ‘n pull ‘a fuckin’ trigger.
Who’re you? Silence. Are you the devil? Silence. Are you my dreams? Silence. Oh well, c’mon. Let’s get it over with! Do your best!
They did and they came smelling of hopelessness, despair and death. They came with big, fat hairy hands and false promises.”
If she had read just twice as many pages, she would have caught a glimmer of the weight that threatens to crush James Nathan and Jake Noland.
The bulk of the novel is scenic in construction. Long passages of dialogue, ordinary settings, packed with quotidien detail: readers quickly develop a sense of the rhythm of everyday life in the community.
This aspect of Robert Arthur Alexie’s novel reads quickly and easily. Even the heavy back-and-forth in the inner-and-outer dialogue (in the quote above) is not overwhelming, because the voice is as often deprecating and funny as it is heartbreaking. (This reminds me of Thomas King’s ability to twin humour with sorrow. Although I never actually laughed aloud while reading this novel. More wry grins.)
The portions of the novel which describe the children’s experiences of residential school life – in particular their transformations into porcupines (the boys, with their super-short haircuts) and china dolls (the girls, with their uniform bobs) – are short and deliberate.
And when the men admit what they endured as students, it seems almost inconsequential.
“How many more?”
“At least one,” he said quietly.
She knew what he meant. “You okay?”
“Yeah, I talked about it when I was in treatment, but never to you or anyone else.”
“You’re not alone,” she said. “You’ll never be alone.”
She knew what he meant – even though he is her husband and this is the first she has heard of this – because she knows this story. It doesn’t require any nouns to members of the community, who have heard this story countless times (though not as many times as it could have been told).
When the story is ultimately told, readers do not endure the details. Even then, it is offered in summary.
“Chief David then grew twenty feet and held himself like a Warrior of Old. He spoke of his days in the hostel and of a man named Tom Kinney. He spoke of trust, honour and respect. He spoke of distrust, dishonour and disrespect. He spoke of little boys and little girls in the hostel. He spoke of porcupines and china dolls. He spoke of late-night visit and long hallways. He spoke of dark rooms and dark dorms.”
And it is offered in the form of small diary-like entries which open the chapters, chronicling the life of an old wolf, worn and tired by the act of survival.
But even if you already know the story of the residential school system, have read and heard other stories by survivors already, there is something remarkable about Robert Arthur Alexie’s novel.
“So our People haven’t drummed for a hundred years?”
“Las’ time ‘ey drummed was 1965 when Chief Francis died. Always liked drum dancin’ . Be good if someone brought it back.” He paused. “Our language will be gone in ‘nother generation. Once ‘at goes we’ll have nothing’.” We’ll be jus’ ‘nother bunch ‘a Indians.
To say anything more would spoil the story, but because this is only halfway through the novel, and because there is a lot to endure before-hand, I will say that, yes, there is drumming.
But, there is still half a book left to read. And although there are still dreams of suicide and death, there are other kinds of dreams, too. After the truth is told.
“They dreamed of three Warriors standing above slain demons, dreams and nightmares like great Warriors of Old covered with blood, sweat, guts, tears and pride.”
Dear Anglican-Reviewer who was stuck on page 68: You should have read on. But, then, perhaps you were expecting some other ending.
Even though the challenge officially begins on July 1 — and ends on the last day of the following June — it’s not too late to join The Book Mine Set’s Canadian Books Challenge.
This year is the tenth event, and John has calculated thousands of books reviewed for past challenges he’s hosted. This time, my challenge will be to read 13 books by indigenous authors.
Rather than share my reading list, which will change throughout the coming months anyway, I’m going to share 13 books by indigenous authors that I would recommend if someone else was undertaking this specific challenge.
These would be my choices for that imagined reader’s challenge:
Beatrice Culleton Mosionier’s The Search for April Raintree (1983)
Perhaps teachers in Canadian schools look to this novel about two Métis sisters as American teachers look to Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird. The prose is spare and accessible and the story is told in the simplest terms, but resonates deeply. (This was the first book I read by an indigenous writer.)
Thomas King’s Green Grass Running Water (1993)
Athough now it is commonly used in classrooms, too, I read this one (my second by an indigenous writer) before it caught the attention of prize-list juries and scholars, so I wasn’t intimidated by the string of accolades. That was lucky, because I just thought it was wickedly smart and funny, and all the acclaim didn’t get in the way of my pulling it off the shelf. Just try it: it’s terrific! (Truth and Bright Water is great too and The Inconvenient Indian is page-turning non-fiction.)
Eden Robinson’s Monkey Beach (2000)
Lisamarie’s voice is incredible: you just can’t stop reading, even when things get ugly. I’ve lost track of the number of people to whom I’ve recommended this novel. Sixteen years later, the only element I remember clearly is that she seemed to leap off the page. Such a vibrant character! I remember also being struck by this sense of the ethereal being a part of reality in a way which seemed both wondrous and strange to me, as it did in Banana Yoshimoto’s fiction. It’s time for a reread obviously! (She is a member of the Haisla and Heiltsuk First Nations.)
Tomson Highway’s Kiss of the Fur Queen (1998)
It opens with a breathtaking scene. Such a rush! But there is so much quiet and deliberate beauty which follows in this novel. It was one of my favourites in that reading year, and it is one of those books which I wanted to reread as soon as I had finished.
Leanne Simpson’s Islands of Decolonial Love (2013)
These short pieces are striking and beautiful. You will be inclined to gobble, because they are accessible and inviting. But they are also powerful and are best enjoyed in a number of sittings rather than all-in-a-gulp. She landed in my stack because I was listening to an interview with Shelagh Rogers and Thomas King on “The Next Chapter”, and he praised her work highly. (She is of Michi Saagiig Nishnaabeg ancestry and is a member of Alderville First Nation.)
Lee Maracle’s Bent Box (2000)
One of the first aboriginal writers to be published in Canada in the 1970s and, since, one of the most prolific aboriginal writers (according to Theytus Press), Lee Maracle’s poetry serves as an excellent introduction to her work. The longest, most dense works are in the second section, which includes poems to/about Mister Mandela, Sojourner Truth, Leonard Peltier and considering injustice in Palestine, Nicaragua, El Salvedor and Chile. (Maracle is of Salish and Cree ancestry, and she is a member of the Sto:loh Nation.)
David A. Groulx’s Under God’s Pale Bones (2010)
When I heard him read at an evening event at the International Festival of Authors, I knew this book was a must-read. These are seering and vital verses which dig deeply beneath the skin to those pale bones. Even though at times the rage is palpable, the same intensity is accorded to beauty. There is much to marvel at here, on the page. So many reminders of what’s worth marvelling at, off the page.
Richard Wagamese’s Medicine Walk (2014)
Although his Indian Horse is a common starting point (it’s shorter and there’s hockey), this is my favourite. It is a reconciliation story on a personal plane (between a father and a son) but one which is so layered and complex that it has much to offer on the matter of reconciliation in a broader sense as well. Although quietly told, it becomes something of a page-turner as the tale unfolds.
Richard van Camp’s Godless but Loyal to Heaven (2012)
This collection landed the author on my MustReadEverything list. The first story still keeps me up at night on occasion, when it flits back into my mind during those dark and lonely hours between three and four in the morning. But as overwhelming as that tale’s power is (based on a traditonal tale, but brought into contemporary times), it’s the stories about ordinary people rather than mythic powers which draw me back to his work.
Edmund Metatawabin’s Up Ghost River (with Alexandra Shimo, 2014)
The language in Up Ghost River is succinct and unsentimental. And, yet, the content is highly emotive. What bridges the gap between these contrary states is a scenic style, as the authors describe Number 15’s experiences in residential school (as Edmund was renamed, to obliterate his family identity).
Jordan Abel’s the place of scraps (2014)
When I was a little girl, I marvelled at the beautiful totem poles in the foyer at the Royal Ontario Museum in Toronto. They were the first things I visited (but, to be fair, not out of true recognition of their beauty or significance, but because they stood between me and the dinosaur gallery, which I both loved and feared, as I got closer and closer to the T-Rex). Jordan Abel’s volume of poetry changed the view for me lastingly and profoundly. His work also made me less afraid of poetry. (I dealt with the T-Rex on my own.)
Joseph Boyden’s Through Black Spruce (2008)
I came to this novel after reading The Orenda, which I did not love as much as many other readers did. And, at first, neither of the alternating voices in Through Black Spruce engaged me either. But, then I began to recognize connections that I missed in the shorter segments. Will is telling his story to his niece from the “dreaming world” and Annie is telling her story to her uncle from the “waking world”, and the process of telling pulls each of the storytellers closer to another dimension (suiting their different needs and positions). It’s quite remarkable.
David Alexander Robertson’s Seven Generations comic series (Stones/Scars/Ends-Begins/The Pact)
Illustrated by Scott B. Henderson, this series is a great option for classroom-use, but also serves as a solid introduction for many of themes explored in greater detail in the longer works listed above. Sugar Falls: A Residential School Story draws specific attention to the Canadian government’s attempts to formalize the process of devastating the core identifty of native children by removing them from their families and traditions.
As for my own reading choices for the challenge reading, those 13 choices?
There are some gaps in my reading, including other works by writers whose previous works I’ve enjoyed (like David A. Groulx’s poems and Lee Maracle’s writing).
And I’ve got two MustReadEverything authors on this list, but I haven’t actually read everything yet (Thonas King and Richard van Camp).
And there are even some non-fiction volumes on my TBR which would fit this challenge (as well as my continued reading of/listening to the summary report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission).
To begin, however: talk, tomorrow, of Robert Arthur Alexie’s Porcupines and China Dolls. And, then, the challenge will officially be underway!
Have you been reading any indigenous authors? Are you participating in the Canadian Books Challenge too?
Rockstar or not, Nicola Harwood’s Flight Instructions for the Commitment Impaired is a bold and absorbing memoir. At times her style is plain and functional, at other times it is poetic and intricate – even captivating, her voice consistently displayed centre-stage.
Caitlin Press, 2016
“No such thing as one true love, just the one sent hurtling against the door, catching your breath like a fly ball but not your words as you flirt outrageously and wonder how she could have fumbled that great line.
No one true love, but a whole lot of small lies told over dinner, draped over a restless urgency that threatens to bend the forks.”
While extended passages of figurative prose might be overwhelming, these poetic bursts are layered between matter-of-fact and often scenic segments, so readers have plenty to secure them to the narrative proper.
For instance, the following passage offers a solid complement to the “true love” musing (which is longer than what is quoted above).
“We slide out of now into then, into our twenties, those heady days of late-night sex and all-day exhaustion; idealistic, co-dependent lesbian unions fueled by drugs, softball, and Adrienne Rich. Unions such as this one, that didn’t stand a chance in hell. And while we are fucking and laughing we are ever so delicately examining the threads of our story. The hopes, the illusions, the disappointments. How young and stupid we were then. How old and stupid we are now.”
Nicola Harwood doesn’t come off as “old and stupid” on the page, however, but spirited and dynamic, open-minded and open-hearted.
She appears to be enchanted by language but also recognizes its shortcomings, including the thorny question of definition, particularly when it comes to one’s identity.
“From dyke to queer to butch to transgender to gender queer to gender fluid to bi-gender, tri-gender, pan-gender and non-binary girly faggot femme boy (not cis-boy!) – identity is like snow. It lies beneath language, fails between words, melts on your tongue.”
The question of commitment is at the heart of the memoir, as the title suggests. “Non-monogamy is a complicated, hyphenated word, which translated into dog language means: don’t fence me in.”
But not only romantic relationships but other kinds of relationships are also explored, both enduring and fleeting. “My writing magazines always have a page devoted to the latest award winners, and I read their achievements with bitterness. Recently I am more interested in stories of failure, especially spectacular failures. The zeppelins of relationships.”
Where does one put down roots? How does one nurture existing ties while accommodating change and growth. “Family. Like Aquarius and her jar of water it pours constantly from every source. For some it is the wine of life while for others it is the hopeless sense of drowning in a sticky mess not entirely of our own creation but somehow, intrinsically, our own. Drowning in our own blood.”
She and her partner – called Lover – establish a relationship with Ant, whose own family has “some queer corners not fully exposed to light”, whose own sexuality was a work in progress. Though a long-time resident of a group home, he gradually establishes a relationship with this couple, who open their home to him after many months of supervised contact although the relationship remains dynamic and complicated.
“If this is the new millennium, this cacophony of race, language, sex and gender, mothers, daughters, sons and sons who are daughters, neighbours and friends. If this is what family will look like in the new millennium, bring it on.”
Nicola Harwood’s writing feels honest and no-holds-barred, like Jowita Bydlowska’s Drunk Mom and Priscila Uppal’s Projection, but it has a flair which makes it read like fiction.
If this is what queer feminist memoir will look like in Caitlin Press’ catalogue, bring it on.
All published in the season which would make them eligible for this year’s Giller Prize, the kaleidoscope of covers for 2016 is now available on Pinterest, a text-based collection here.
They had me at list-making, but also there are prizes, for lucky list-makers (rules, here). The URLs below link to my review here, on BuriedInPrint.
My first list for this year was based on the titles on this year’s Crazy for Canlit List which I’ve read, which I can recommend.
This list is based on the titles which are on my TBR list because I’ve read and enjoyed another of that author’s work.
Twenty-three = one for each year of the Giller Prize.
Andre Alexis’ Hidden Keys (Coach House Books)
Because his short stories were strangely captivating and this new cycle is such an interesting exploration
Kelley Armstrong’s Betrayals (Random House Canada)
Because the first two volumes, Omens and Visions, were so intriguing
Linwood Barclay’s Far From True (Doubleday Canada)
Because reading A Tap on the Window made me want to read ten more of his novels
George Elliott Clarke’s The Motorcyclist (HarperCollins)
Because I don’t even have words for how much I loved Whylah Falls
Emma Donoghue’s The Wonder (HarperCollins)
Because even though I didn’t love Room, I did love Kissing the Witch
Terry Fallis’ Poles Apart (McClelland & Stewart)
Because he’s made me smile before, say with No Relation
Darren Greer’s Advocate (Cormorant)
Because his novel Still Life with June is a real favourite
Ian Hamilton’s Princeling of Nanjing (House of Anansi)
Because there is muh to enjoy about Ava Lee’s adventures, as with The Water Rat of Wanchai
Maureen Jennings’ Dead Ground in Between (McClelland & Stewart)
Because her early Murdoch mysteries were satisfying from many angles
Shari LaPeña’s The Couple Next Door (Doubleday)
Because I love a good thriller and Economic Happiness was just great
Kathy Page’s The Two of Us (Biblioasis)
Because the stories in Paradise and Elsewhere were fascinating
House of Anansi, 2013
Chad Pelley’s Four-Letter Words (Breakwater Books)
Because his first two novels engaged me from the start, Every Little Thing and Away from Everywhere
Iain Reid’s I’m Thinking of Ending Things (Simon & Schuster)
Because despite full-hearted resistance, I was totally drawn into The Truth about Luck
David Adams Richards’ Principals to Live By (Doubleday)
Because even when I try to stop reading his sad stories, I keep reading another, like Crimes Against My Brother
Edward Riche’s Today I Learned It Was You (House of Anansi)
Because he made me smile with Easy to Like
Nicholas Ruddock’s Night Ambulance (Breakwater Books)
Because The Parabolist kept me turning pages
John Steffler’s Geman Mills (Gaspereau)
Because The Afterlife of George Cartwright was so fine
Yasuko Thanh’s Mysterious Fragrance of the Yellow Mountains (Hamish Hamilton)
Because her debut short story collection, Floating like the Dead, was very accomplished
Richard Van Camp’s Night Moves (Enfield & Wizenty)
Because he’s one of my MRE Authors, beginning with Godless But Loyal to Heaven
Great Plains Publications – Enfield & Wizenty, 2012
M.G. Vassanji’s Nostalgia (Doubleday)
Because from No New Land to And Home Was Kariakoo, he tells such good stories
Russell Wangersky’s The Path of Most Resistance (House of Anansi)
Because I still remember some of the stories in Whirl Away
Richard B. Wright’s Nightfall (Simon & Schuster)
Because Clara Callan is an ATF and Mr. Shakespeare’s Bastard stood out
Alissa York’s The Naturalist (Random House Canada)
Because Fauna was one of my favourite books of that reading year
McClelland & Stewart, 1991
Next time: another list, a shorter one, on Pinterest, with a surprise theme.
Are you Crazy For Canlit? What’s on YOUR list?
In the final volume of the Bill Hodges trilogy, the timeline briefly veers back to the opening scene of Mr. Mercedes. This time, a few minutes after the scene which opens the series. (Then it returns to a contemporary setting, a few years after Finders Keepers.)
Scribner – S&S, 2016
This kind of attention-to-detail, careful backseat-driving on the author’s part, gives readers the sense of finally being able to assemble a kaleidoscope of images into a broader understanding of the events they have witnessed in the earlier volumes.
As a standalone, Mr. Mercedes does not put all of King’s narrative strengths on display, but they shine just as brightly in the context of the trilogy as a whole.
This is partly a matter of familiarity. Many secondary characters, whose roles have increased in importance in the second and third volumes, now make vitally important contributions to the story. Their presence in Mr. Mercedes might have appeared situational, but now readers are so heavily invested that they will wonder whether some of them could appear in future novels as lead characters.
It’s also partly a matter of the first volume serving as an introduction in many respects. The character of Mr. Mercedes is a driving force behind Bill Hodges, and in the series’ first volume readers have a bird’s eye view of his psyche. (Even the villains in Stephen King’s stories have whole and complete stories, sometimes especially the villains.)
“Brady Hartsfield, aka Mr. Mercedes, wanted to converse with the cop who had failed to catch him, and, although retired, Hodges was very willing to talk. Because once you got dirtbags like Mr. Mercedes talking (there weren’t very many like him, and thank God for that), they were only a step or two from being caught. This was especially true of the arrogant ones, and Hartsfield had been arrogance personified.”
Readers might approach End of Watch as a standalone, in terms of the resolution of the mystery at the heart of this volume, because there is background (like this paragraph) offered, but a single paragraph cannot capture the depth of characterization that the series’ first volume offers readers, in its entirety. But readers will not have the same emotional investment in Hodges’ character (or the lives of the secondary characters)
It’s one thing to have Hodges’ guilt presented as an observation: “It was kind of like quitting smoking: hard at first, easier as time went by. Now whole weeks sometimes pass without thoughts of Brady and Brady’s terrible crimes.”
But it’s quite another to have followed his attempts to exorcize the guilt and sorrow throughout the years which have passed since the initial crime.
“The citations never mattered to hin. The reward was the flash of light that came with the connections. He found himself unable to give it up. Hence Finders Keepers instead of retirement.”
Bill has opted to continue in his pursuit of justice, operating Finders Keepers as one means of righting wrongs (his own and others’), and he has able staff members who are similarly preoccupied (characters introduced in earlier volumes, unnamed to avoid spoilers).
This small group has traversed from community to family, over the course of some years, united not only in their pursuit of justice but also in their affection for one another. Solving crimes is a dangerous business, the burden of past losses and failures is heavy. Bill is not the only one experiencing some health problems as he works to cope with the strain.
“There’s more to it! More more more! But they’re just going to sweep it under the rug and they didn’t even say the real reason which is so Pete can have a nice retirement party without this hanging over his head the way you had to retire with the Mercedes Killer hanging over yours and so the papers don’t make a big deal out of it and you know there’s more to it I know you do and I know you have to get your test results I want you to get them beause I’m so worried, but those poor women…I just don’t think…they don’t deserve to…to just be shoveled under!”
The idea of one’s chosen family reverberates throughout King’s writing, from “The Body” to The Stand, from Carrie (not all families are happy) to the volumes in this trilogy. Alliances are key.
But one of the factors which makes those alliances so powerful is the presence of a powerful contrary force, an indiviual or group who seeks to destroy that unity.
And not all villains appear to be as dangerous as they are. “Every time I’ve been to see him, he just sits there. Bland as a bowl of oatmeal.”
There’s that breakfast cereal again, noted in Finders Keepers too, as evidence of the subtle details which draw volumes in this series together.
Another instance of this is evident with Bill’s references to popular culture, which are frequently overlooked by younger or less engaged characters, but which are not only appreciated but boosted by his friends, whose similar interests supplement his own.
“He hangs up and heads back to the hospital, breaking into a clumsy trot. He thinks, This goddam place is like the Mafia. Every time I think I’m out, it pulls me back in.”
Just when I think I’ve read enough of Stephen King, he pulls me back in. The Bill Hodges trilogy is solid storytelling and showcases his talent so brightly that I am keen to pull other works of his off the shelf this summer.
Discussion of Mr. Mercedes appears here, Finders Keepers here. Is this series on your TBR? Or, something else by Stephen King?