After last year’s gulp and gobble of new books, I have been tentative and restless. I touch my tongue to a book in my stacks, then move on, relishing the contrasting flavours but rarely sitting for a meal. Here, in Lorna Goodison’s Controlling the Silver (2005), I found this musing on blended heritage, where the “gods of England Africa worshipped cheek by jowl”, just in time for March 17th.
“On St. Patrick’s day it was great-grandfather
George O’Brian Wilson who crooned Irish
airs that fell and took root as casuarinas
beneath which he caused our great-grand
mother Leanna to fall, wanting as he did
then to ingest her Guinea essence as it rose
in a light ellipse from her griot throat. But
she swallowed hard and retained her story
which I was brought here to tell. Who was he?”
Her poems are beautiful and just formal enough to remind me that I had intended to study more poetry this year but, instead, I dabble.
The dabbling has created some satisfying interconnections (the kind of synchronicities that Rebecca loves too!), so that here, in her collection, I find a poem titled “Arctic, Antarctic, Atlantic, Pacific, Indian Ocean” and, in Kim Fahner’s Some Other Sky, I find a sequence of poems, one for each of the Great Lakes (Huron, Ontario, Michigan, Erie, and Superior).
But beyond this, I’ve been struck by how poems, too, invite us to change our perspective, to temporarily embody a different way of being in the world. In fewer words! In “Guernica”, for instance, Goodison writes “Imagine if you can, the entire population of Jamaica can be accommodated on Rhode Island; and my first white Christmas spent alone in a Queen’s apartment.”
These big ideas of belonging and identity, dislocation and loneliness, freedom and possibility: in a couple of lines. All these longer forms that I have spent time with (and Goodison has written both a memoir and stories that I’ve enjoyed too), and here these ideas lodge in very few words.
Of course, I likely could find haiku that express these ideas even more succinctly. Which sets me to wondering. Would I have finished knitting that sweater, for which I bought the yarn more than ten years ago now, if I had read more poems than novels? Maybe I would speak another language entirely—and be able to translate lines of poetry in it—if I hadn’t been so intimidated by verse?
But before I get too far down that road, in my stack with Goodison and Fahner is Johann Hari’s Stolen Focus (2022) too. For many, his book has been a revelation: Why You Can’t Pay Attention—and How to Think Deeply Again. But it’s taken me weeks to read this book. In theory, his blend of personal and analytical information should broaden his style’s appeal, but I found that I enjoyed both (the story of how he set aside his smart phone for months alongside statistics pulled from studies about concentration, work habits, and stress) but not at the same time. It became an episodic read, whereas I expected it to be wholly compelling.
And, ironically, the notes I took were not about focus, but more general ideas about how we live, and words that others wrote, not Hari. For instance, the Spanish writer José Ortega y Gasset, who said: “We cannot put off living until we are ready…. Life is fired at us point-blank.”
And Neale Donald Walsch, who writes: “Life begins at the edge of our comfort zone.”
And, finally, James Williams who explains to Hari that “people say it’s too late to make certain changes to the web or platforms or digital technology” but the ax existed for 1.4 million years before anyone added a handle to it, whereas the web is “less than ten thousand years old.”
2022 is barely 100 days old and I haven’t been reading very much. Except for the books that I’ve read for work, like everything by Sarah Moss and Marlon James and, now, Pat McCabe.
Instead, I have been living at point-blank range, at the edge of my comfort zone, wondering if I should buy an axe.
Finishing the sweater may not be a question of prose vs poetry (as L.M. Montgomery would probably say) but more of multitasking. All the most successful knitters do it while engaged in doing something else, sometimes quietly and sometimes flamboyantly. Noted author and pediatrician and Betsy-Tacy fan Perri Klass, long before I knew her, wrote an article about how she knit throughout med school and got a lot of funny looks but her focus was not impaired by knitting (not sure how she took notes, however, and maybe we’d all rather have a doctor who took notes during med school). Unless you listened to someone else reading, you would probably not have got much knitting done anyway.
Most of the other people on my library Friends group are knitters and we have a big yarn sale every spring (well, halted during Covid). I have never knit anything but simple scarves and my crocheting is also very basic. But the yarn at the sale is so beautiful I always buy some! I would like to learn how to knit a sweater but I think it would be too time consuming.
Hahaha, the evidence does show that manual note-taking helps with recall and intention, so I wonder if her patients would have been deterred by that information about her habits in school! But I always admired the people I saw on the subway who would pull out a yarn-y project onto their laps for just a few stops and then tuck it away again, in such a matter-of-fact manner. Which isn’t even multi-tasking, given that the train operator is doing the work of getting that person to their destination!
I know what you mean about how beautiful some of the yarn is. It does get you thinking about all the possibilities. But, as you say, it would cut dramatically into reading time!
My reading has been really slow this year. I am trying to focus on quality over quantity and just reading what I am really in the mood for, rather than what I feel I should read next. Poetry is definitely not something I am in the mood for right now, though I can’t explain why.
If I hadn’t already borrowed a large stack of poetry back in December, shortly before Omicron surged here, when the local library branch was still open, I don’t think I’d’ve thought to be reading poetry just now either. But I’m glad that I had it here, after all.
“Why You Can’t Pay Attention—and How to Think Deeply Again” reminds me of another book I read (except the title isn’t coming to mind at the moment). I ended up being way more aware of time I was spending on social media, on my phone, etc. Except I feel like I’ve feel back into these back habits again. I should check this book out.
You make me giggle at the idea that you couldn’t think deeply enough to remember the title of that other book! Like–you really DO need to read THIS one. Heheh That’s true for me, too: I get inspired by what I read but, unless I get to making a concrete habit while I’m still in the flush of that excitement, the habit I’d already established wins out every time!
I’m on hold for the Hari book at the library. A very fitting topic for me these days. I have been feeling a shift in my reading lately, maybe temporary – who knows? I want to read things that I *want* to read and not that I feel I *should * read. So I’m having a hard time with my Classics Club challenge lately. Abandoned Nicholas Nickleby and it doesn’t look good for Hunchback of Notre Dame either. Right now I am so consumed by world events and trouble with my mother that when I read I want to be taken away and not have to concentrate. Poetry is good for that! Short stories too – I just finished a suspense collection by Ruth Rendell, which was very good. I’ve been reading a collection by Ada Limon and it’s fabulous. I echo Jeanne’s Lucille Clifton suggestion. She’s one of my favorites. Reading goes in waves and shifting rhythms like everything else in life, right? That’s what I’m telling myself. 🙂
If you haven’t read Daphne du Maurier’s short stories, I’m betting you’d find them enjoyable too. A little Rendell-ish but with that mid-20th-century zing. For me, I seem to have a limit for should-ness, just in general. If I’m being very dutiful or establishing new habits off-the-page, I find it harder to choose more demanding books. When I feel like I’m making time to relax or de-stress (even from good stress), I have the brain-space to focus on classics or more demanding prose styles. I know we both have trouble making time to relax, but at least your reading sounds relaxing these days!
Maybe you should look for short poems–Lucille Clifton or Berryman’s Dream Songs. Or Postcard Poems!
Haha–that’s an excellent idea. And so appropriate coming from you. Maybe some limericks too? 🙂
Stolen Focus sounds like a useful read for many, especially now, but like you, I think I would have trouble focusing on it? I’ve noticed my focus being drastically reduced lately, especially when I’m working from home. I removed twitter off my phone (I just have it on my personal laptop now) to avoid getting caught up on doomscrolling, but I found Instagram reels suck me in too. The only thing I can do without getting distracted lately is reading books, which I suppose i should be grateful for 🙂
What disrupted it for me, was the sense that it didn’t fit my expectations of it either being all personal and conversational or being more about psychology and science with more data and quotations and statistics. It just didn’t suit either of those reading moods for me consistently. But the style didn’t call for a straight-backed chair and a cup of coffee either: you might enjoy it way more than I did! Fortunately, you’ve got plenty of books around to read, so you just need to read them! Heheh
As others have said, I’m sure you’re still reading a significant amount! But the dabbling can be a good way of getting a sense of books, so you’ll now what to pick up when the mood takes you for a longer read. I have a throw I’ve been meaning to knit for three years so maybe I should read more poetry too!
Maybe we should make a quiet little vow for the coming cold season (i.e. when one is more often indoors with yarn) and you’ll study your thrown pattern and I’ll study my sweater details and remember how to knit a swatch.
I skimmed Hari’s book – ha! And then found he’s a serial plagiariser so wasn’t so upset by that. I’m also really bad at reading poetry, although I was chatting about poets today after parkrun and realising there were quite a few I do like.
Was it you that mentioned Wendy Cope recently? She’s so smart and funny. As I mentioned in my comment to JacquiWine, I’d missed the controversy about his writing. I can’t even find a note to suggest where I got the idea of reading this book to begin with (I thought it was Stefanie, but no!). But now that I’ve investigated, I think it’s pertinent that he seems to have admitted to his wrongdoing and called out some of his specific mistakes and unprofessional behaviour. I also appreciated that it seems he could have used his addiction as an excuse (given the timelines of his experiences, but I’m coming to it all much after the fact) but refused to link discuss his substance abuse in the context of his ethical violations. Plagiarism really gets my back up, but I also wonder how one copes with the kind of public shame that proliferates in the era of the culture wars.
It might have been, I do like her work! I read about Hari’s previous controversy but then found a review (which of course I can’t find now!) which strongly suggests he doesn’t attribute all of his statements, etc., in this one, either, so I didn’t feel happy reviewing it on my blog. So it sounds like he copes by keeping on doing it …
I think it’s just as important to scrutinise the work of the journalist who is criticising this writer’s process too, however. Particularly in an era characterised by pile-ons: doesn’t it feel as though many people are poised to attack these days?
There are some professional reviewers who behave in a manner that I consider unethical as well, who rely on Google and other people’s writing and thinking rather than putting in the work themselves (and I understand how they justify it, the work being underpaid and difficult to secure). I’m not saying that the specific reviewer you’re referencing here (who wrote the review you can’t find), has been unethical or sloppy with their research or expression, but I think a broader skepticism is fair, just speaking generally, rather than assume that accusations are true.
There’s nothing wrong with dabbling now and again, and poetry could be a good option for that! 🙂
On the other books you’ve mentioned, I’m not sure if you’re aware of some of the controversary surrounding Johann Hari’s Stolen Focus in the UK. There’s a thread on it here if you’re interested.
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1479125910896975877.html
Oh, thank you: no, I’d not heard of that, and what an i-n-t-e-r-e-s-t-i-n-g situation. I think there should be more rigorous examination when it comes to studies and data, generally, but particularly in regards to journalism and reportage. It’s been fascinating, for instance, observing the different reporting on studies about COVID in the US and Canadian newspapers and, then, following up to read the available studies online for myself.
But I also question whether an individual who seems to be putting all their energy into challenging just one writer (and being disappointed when they don’t opt for a public debate, in this era of heightened divisiveness) might be exorcising a personal grievance, too. Some of the items in this thread seem valid to me, whereas others are practices that I expect occur often in this publishing sector (for instance, with an open-ended result, reporting only on the elements that support a thesis and leaving the rest out but including publication info for the study in the endnotes).
“Would I have finished knitting that sweater, for which I bought the yarn more than ten years ago now, if I had read more poems than novels?” Probably not. Maybe you should have started with a scarf? 🙂
There are so many things swirling around us at the moment that it can be hard to focus. I don’t find self-help books very helpful, ironically. And now, there are apps that reward you when you don’t touch your phone…This world never ceases to amaze me.
Anyway, I’m sure that “not reading a lot” by your standards is still “reading a lot” by others’. You sound like you’re missing good recreational reading. I usually turn to crime fiction for that or novellas.
Happy reading!
Hahaha Maybe I should have stuck with scarves and dishcloths, yes, but at the time it was exciting. There was supposed to be a shawl somewhere in there, though, so maybe I should revisit the idea of a stepping-stone in the direction of the sweater!
Ironically, though, it was an app that got me into the habit of meditation, which I think is contradictory but funny. It makes me smile because it feels like using the down-side of these very addictive systems to create another kind of addictive analog system (i.e. sitting peacefully somewhere, calming your mind).
Recreationally. I’ve been watching films more frequently and I’ve finished a couple of series (Love Life, I May Destroy You) and now I’m catching up with The Handmaid’s Tale. So I’m still enjoying narratives, but you’re probably right…crime could make for a fine escape!
“Would I have finished knitting that sweater, for which I bought the yarn more than ten years ago now, if I had read more poems than novels? ”
No, no you wouldn’t because you would be caught up in reading more poetry and then spending time re-reading it and thinking about it and your sweater wouldn’t be any further along. 🙂
Funny you mention the Hari book, I was just reading an interview with him today and I thought, wow, that books sounds really interesting. My library has it on order and over 200 of my neighbors also think it sounds interesting. 😀 But your mention of William James is probably the 5th or 6th time his name has popped up this month and and I see him mentioned so often even before now that I keep thinking I really need to read him especially The Varieties of Religious Experience. have you every read him before?
Heheh, thanks Stefanie. You’re probably right. Maybe THIS winter I’ll get a light that shines brightly enough to pick up some stitch work in the evenings again? But I can read poetry in weak light more easily! (Or, at least any mistakes I make are less visible.)
Is it William James (who has a connection at Oxford currently) or James William (the late 19th/early 20thC writer) that you keep seeing people refer to? I guess it could be either? I think the book you read last year, on the same topic, likely covered off most of these ideas. Here’s a short article via the Irish Times if you want just a little more info. And his TED talks on Addiction from 2015 and Depression/Anxiety from 2019.
Okay where does the axe come from or come into play?? I appreciate you sharing about not reading much which is comforting to me in a way. I’ve read 21 books so far which has been alright though most of them have been in the three star range so, I’m hoping 2022 has more satisfying books on the horizon! And it’s cool that you can enjoy poetry and write reflectively about it because I rarely get poetry at all, alas.
Hehe Just thinking that it might be better to reach for some older “technology” as per that quotation from the Johann Hari book. Symbolic axes are overdone, though, I know!
My theory on reading poetry this year is one that I’m borrowing from my experience with short stories: I just kept reading them until I started to actually like them and to understand how they were different from other reading so that I was expecting something other-than-a-short-novel when I sat down to read one. (Maybe this sounds obvious? But I had to sort out that bit for myself.) Maybe I’ll get comfortable with it, maybe I won’t.
Yeah, I’m going to echo Reese here and predict that your “not much” is everyone else’s “whole lot” 🙂 Working your way through an author’s whole oeuvre is impressive but not something I’d do as I like to space out the pleasure (and fear finding the books too samey). I enjoyed the irony of you failing to focus on Hari’s book on focus! His book on depression was underwhelming for me. Self-help books rarely reward reading all the way through; the exceptions for me are narrative/travel-based, like Gretchen Rubin’s and Helen Russell’s. My latest serendipity — sneak preview of the next post! — was espresso martinis being drunk in two books I was reading at once, one F and one NF.
That’s true. That’s a misstep I’ve made in the past (but not chronologically); my Great Pym-blur, which I’ve never quite sorted as I read everything I could get from the library in about a month and have only reread a few subsequently, and Marge Piercy (same, but it took a little longer because they were harder to borrow). Now I’m picky, and I try to select writers who seem to be trying to do different things with each books for this kind of work but, of course, not having read them (which is the whole point LOL) it’s not a fool-proof plan! TY for noticing that! Hee hee Self-help feels more Gretchen Rubin than Johann Hari to me (but I’ve only read one of each); if I’d been thinking of him that way, I probably would have expected more dabbling and less reading. Oh, that’s a particularly fun one, because if you sit them together on a shelf, it’s like they’re attending the same party! Now I’ll have to see which ones they were in your post.
I suspect your hardly reading at all is still likely a whole lot of reading… 😉 But poetry also feels nice for those moments when one only wants a burst.
Plato thought the introduction of writing was the end of our ability to concentrate. It’s too late for all of us!
Hmmm, that’s true. And I was planning to explore more poetry and graphic novels this year, so that’s not a surprise. It’s been a really interesting reading year so far, contrasting but still largely enjoyable.
Hah! That’s an excellent point: perspective, priorities. 🙂
Maybe just let yourself stumble across the axe when you’re ready? Or perhaps pick up that sweater again, like Lee’s work on cabinets, the creating things with your hands can be such a life-balancer.
It took me a second to take in that “less than ten thousand years old.” Sometimes it feels as though it’s all been around even longer…
Hehe Or maybe I could make my own when I need a break from yarn-work.
It’s such a useful framing device, that quotation, because it DOES feel like it’s always been there, so pervasive is its influence.
I’m coming around to the realisation that my grumblings about lack of reading recently are of no consequence when I think about all the other problems in the world right now. I don’t mean that to sound judgemental of you or anyone else, we all deal with things in different ways.
Do you feel like the Russian invasion of Ukraine has adjusted your perspective in this way, or is it something else that’s impacted your thinking? Has it made you any more likely to reach for reading outside of your comfort zone?
I’ve been dabbling in a lot of good books this year; reading more poetry is a change, but I’m interested to find that many poets are taking on the same themes that I’ve been exploring in my reading in other forms.
Yes the events in Ukraine are giving me pause for thought and reflection. I’m not seeking out comfort reads as such but I’m definitely looking for books that are completely absorbing. The result is that I’m starting and abandoning many more books than normal
Perhaps, even though it’s uncomfortable, it’s something of an awakening for you, then. Maybe a broader consideration of how you’re spending time and what matters most, in your own life and in others’ lives. Times of transition really wrestle with my focus, I know: I can relate!
The poetry collections and graphic novels that I’ve been reading have been here for many weeks now, borrowed just before half the city libraries shut down with the Omicron spread in December; I think I’d started all of them (dozens!) in the intervening weeks and only recently forced myself to return to the unfinished volumes (not on principle, but I had enjoyed them, and hadn’t any real reason to set them aside).
The Hari’s premise reminds me of Nicolas Carr’s The Shallows of which Barack Obama is a big fan. I read it back in 2010 when it was first published and it rang alarm bells loud and clear for me. Not that I’ve given up all my devices since…
Seems like much of Hari’s book makes similar observations. Maybe the only difference is that, at that time, plenty of people still used flip-phones for talking and texting, but a dozen years later smartphones proliferate and our access to them has increased (e.g. even on the subway now!), all perhaps summed up as More-of-everything-that-Carr-already-said.
Hmm, in my eightieth year now there’s only the aftermath of life’s blast, which I deal with at a slow pace. I’ve been trying to get through Ducks, Newburyport, nodding off and losing my place, and otherwise working on repairing our kitchen cabinets. Getting back to making sawdust at least keeps awake 😉 Whatever works for you:-)
Nice of you to stop by, Lee, and I’m glad to hear that you’ve putting to work that new workbench you constructed: gorgeous and functional! Ellman’s seems like the perfect book to doze off with while reading. I know it’s not all one sentence, but it feels like that, so I doubt you’re missing much. (I only dabbled in it, but only because of a duedate.)
What I want to know is… What were the results of Hari’s months-long phone ban? Or is that a big spoiler? I don’t think I could do it – I’d miss everyone I keep in touch with too much!
About poetry: when I watched the poetry panel on Zoom the other night, I was struck by how much fun the poets had reading and talking about their poetry. They were so passionate about it, and it’s contagious! It inspired me to get out my accumulated poetry collections. Just in time for April!
You are commenting on your phone, aren’t you? Heheh Somehow you’ve replied to Lee!
I found the logistics of it pretty interesting too. For instance, he gave the number (he had a phone that was designed with massive buttons, to use as a call for help, lacking any internet connection) to six people in his life, for emergency reasons, so of course I wanted to know who were those six people! At one point, when he was really feeling the withdrawal, which actually wasn’t right away, he played at pressing the buttons, as if he was actually using his old smart phone!) but later, after time passes, he goes to the public library on a Sunday afternoon (there’s just one in Provincetown). He thought he would fall down the rabbit hole, but he left after a couple of hours, all caught up and disenchanted with it (the conclusion being that if you’re not sending a tonne of emails, you don’t have a tonne to answer either).
Yes, I was on my phone. Lol I was when I commented on the Macleod story, too, but somehow it worked that time! I never know what’s going to happen. It’s the same when I use my phone to comment on Anne’s blog, too.
Interesting! That’s similar to what the Four Thousand Weeks guy had to say about number of emails. When it comes to social media, though, I almost feel rude when I go a long time without connecting somehow with my friends. The same feeling I used to have before social media and I would go a long time without phoning or writing a letter. Connecting on social media would be quicker if it weren’t for all the distractions once you log on!
You were the first person to comment on that story so maybe the app simply couldn’t figure how to nest your comment in some strange place! Heheh
I think there’s a distinction between the compulsion to respond to every notification, from various platforms, and the phenomenon you’re commenting on, with regard to relationships and communication; I suspect that he came to this topic more out of the addiction question than the relationship question (but I could be wrong). Do you think that most relationships work any better/differently online than offline? I mean, some people reach out and other people do not, different people have different alarms that sound like you’re describing (how long has it been? I should…) and I wonder if it’s really all that different whether it takes 2 minutes to send a DM or 20 minutes to stick a postcard in the mail and walk to the box. I can say this all smugly because I happen to be writing your address on an envelope right now. Hee hee
Hah! And, as I was writing my comment, I was thinking about that letter I keep meaning to write you – it’s a biggie. I have one of those things to say that should be said in a letter. Or on the phone. But I think, for this one, a letter would be best. 🙂
Oh right, addiction to the notifications and pings and instant gratification – I was just thinking about what matters to me most about the internet and all its platforms. Maybe that means I’m not addicted! I do get easily distracted, though…
Now you’ll have gotten everyone who reads this so curious that you’ll have to write a post about it instead! Heheh
Yah, I think it’s more about the design and the overall intention to retain users’ engagement with the site/app/tech/whatever and it doesn’t seem like that’s had much of an impact on your daily life. Maybe NF though! Although I guess you can still blame Younger Kid for that, for awhile anyhow. *grins*
My advice is start simple and tie a sharp stone to a stick with a vine. But to go back to the beginning, you’re that little girl at parties aren’t you who licks all the lollies and puts them back in the bowl. (Which is certainly something I would have done to my brothers, but maybe not in public).
Hahaha, a gradual approach to axe-construction: that sounds like a title for a collection of poetry. That reminds me of those families who poked the insides of all the chocolates in a box, from the bottom, so that they could see which was which and then choose the caramels and the nuts! Really, I’m more the person who swipes the lollies and eats them later alone, in the company of a good book (or twenty unfinished ones, lately anyhow).