For nearly as long as I’ve been a reader, I’ve sought out books about/by people who were preoccupied by ideas about how and where we belong. At first, I used to look for stories with characters who felt they didn’t belong in the same ways that I felt I didn’t belong. But, over time, I found it more interesting to see how different characters’ situations can be and still they feel similarly about not fitting in, not belonging.
In one of the most frequently challenged/banned books, George M. Johnson’s All Boys Aren’t Blue (2020), George doesn’t even kiss another boy until thirty pages from the end of the book. (Although identifying as he/him while writing, they now identify as non-binary: the narrative triumphs the concept of fluidity from start to stop.)
There’s talk of both challenges and joys of being an effeminate boy in elementary school, about preferring to play Double Dutch with the girls at recess to playing sports with the boys, all described in direct and simple terms.
But it seems possible that the most subversive idea in this memoir is the willingness to question boundaries and expectations, to simply allow people to express and explore themselves.


Nnedi Okorafor’s LaGuardia (2019) was inspired partly by her Nigerian parents’ experiences having emigrated to America in 1969 (and staying, unexpectedly, because of the Biafran War) and partly by her own experience stopped at customs because she was wearing headgear (she wasn’t: this is how her hair was described to another border official).
What does it mean to be viewed as an alien?
She describes herself as being weary of dystopian narratives like her own Who Fears Death (pure dystopia) and excited by stories like Lagoon and Binti (set in the same universe as this story) for their more optimistic view. LaGuardia is brightly coloured and good fun to read—and the “aliens” are the best part.
Little Dog, in Ocean Vuong’s first novel On Earth We’re Briefly Gorgeous (2019), lives with his mom and grandmother, who came to Hartford, Connecticut from Vietnam, with a legacy of wartime trauma.
There’s a sense of suspension between beauty and pain, with Vuong’s lyrical language sometimes offering respite and sometimes heightening the despair. Little Dog’s injuries—he absorbs blows of all sorts—leave deep wounds: that’s the hinge on which this story turns.
“It’s not fair that the word laughter is trapped inside slaughter. We’ll have to cut it open, you and I, like a newborn lifted, red and trembling, from the just-shot doe.”
In one of my favourite scenes, his mother pockets the payment made by a woman who comes to the salon before opening hours.
This economic reality is significant (how does one family survive in a new country, with an ageing mother and young child depending on a single income).
But even more crucial, the customer has a prosthetic leg and Little Dog’s mother massages the space no longer occupied by the woman’s leg: pain inescapable but also invisible.
Randa Abdel-Fattah’s Discipline (2025) landed on my TBR because it landed on an episode of David Naimon’s podcast, and after that, more controversy ensued. (Which my Australian friends have summarised and linked to, here and here.)
There were people who tried to stop this book from being published. They failed,” she writes, in her Acknowledgements. There are some redacted lines there too: the situation is fraught.


Discipline is controversial in some of the same ways that the TV series Mo is controversial on-screen, simply by prioritising the inner- and outer-lives of young Palestinians and Muslims.
They have families and tasks to complete each day: they are not simply the stuff of headlines and a set of tragic statistics. And because the novel is written as a series of scenes, it feels a little like you’re watching a show. But, simultaneously, there’s a sense of this being a thesis brought to life.
Abdel-Fattah writes:
“They were all constantly encountering their lives through a lenticular lens. Viewed from one angle: joy, love, laughter, tensions, privilege, routine. Viewed from the slightest tilt: tragedy, injustice, oppression.” And the author risks being seen as the representative resistor, as Hannah: “Hannah refused to acquiesce to the process. She refused, she refused, she refused.”
Christina Li’s Clues to the Universe (2021) was a whimsical borrowing from the children’s department because instead of the usual jacket copy, there’s a numbered list, and that reminded me of my beloved Anastasia Krupnik series (by Lois Lowry). The list is from the second chapter, which is in Benji’s voice; the novel begins with Ro’s— Ro, for Rosalind—voice.
Neither kid fits with their classmates, but they seem to fit together, because neither has a father: Ro’s has died and Benji’s has disappeared. Ro is all about science and rockets and space; Benji is all about drawing and superheroes and licorice. Li’s language is simple, her themes timeless, and the alternating pov invites us to lean in, where just the right-amount-of-resolution settles in a place I like: where things aren’t perfect, but they might be okay.
“You don’t think I hear what people say about me? You don’t think I know that they say I’m a homeless-looking, know-it-all freak?” Her voice rose. “What’s wrong with me? What’s wrong with wanting to figure out how fast the Earth rotates around the sun or wanting to launch a rocket because I want to know things? Because I actually care?”
All year, stories like these have been in my stack. Now, in Ocean Vuong’s next novel, in Natsuo Kirino’s Swallows (Trans. Lisa Hofmann-Kuroda), Amitav Ghosh’s Ghost-Eye, and in Elena Ferrante’s Neopolitan Quartet, other characters are whispering that I hold back this post and include them too. I like to think of them all, chatting amongst themselves in the next room, after I go to sleep: finding company with one another, at last.
Have you been meeting characters like this in your reading lately?

What a great bunch of books in this post. I haven’t read any of them but they all appeal. I’ve read some Nnedi Okorafor and enjoyed her but not that one.
I keep meaning to get to her latest novel, but something keeps getting in the way!
An excellent selection here, thank you!
Thanks, Liz: hope you’re well!
Yay for La Guardia! It is a fun book. I will read Ocean Vuong one of these days, I am determined. I also have a copy of Discipline because of Between the Covers and hope to get to it sooner rather than later.
It IS fun, although I also understand why readers who went into it expecting more of a Who-Fears-Death vibe could feel a little let down. I’m not sure if David Naimon has a subscription model where you can sign up for all the books, but maybe he should? hee hee Have you watched “Mo” or “Ramy”? Both I like very much, but I feel like they’re really more intended to resonate with American viewers?
OMG if he had a book subscription I would be doomed! I have not watched Mo or Ramy, I’m not much of a watcher of things.
Heheh, right?! They are both good for showing ordinary lives of Muslim Americans, but Mo, in particular gets right into the politics of daily life from a Palestinian-American pov. (If the shows are new to anyone else, here’s a short article about Mo.) They’re both considered comedies, but I think they’re also making serious points.
That quote about laughter as being part of slaughter – oooofff!!! Powerful stuff right there, I need to mull over that some more. You have a real talent for picking up the best quotes Marcie!
I haven’t read All Boys Aren’t Blue but I’ve always wanted to, it’s such a beautiful cover. I wonder if they would ever make it into a picture book for younger kids…
I’ve reread that so many times: it makes me sit up straighter somehow. Maybe we just have similar taste when it comes to lyrical bits!
That does seem to be a trend, and OOH I think it’s great but, OTOH I bet there are loads of other writers who are writing primarily for younger audiences already, whose stories would also be moving and striking.
I suppose the thing I read most recently in that vein was Colson Whitehead’s first The Intuitionist. He was at the Appel Salon recently. When the library delivers the newest I suspect I’ll read that.
I gobbled up The Intuitionist in a ratty little trade paperback from the TPL: I could hardly put it down (and barely knew what was what!). I don’t have my copy of the third one yet either: maybe we’ll end up reading it at the same time! (I’m guessing it’ll be third or fourth week of September for mine.)
These stories sounds so intriguing and very important especially since books are being banned across the US at a alarming rate. George M. Johnson’s novel sounds so good. It’s been on TBR for a while, but I haven’t gotten a chance to read it yet.
There was a nice new paperback on the library shelf: I couldn’t resist! (And it counts as a Blue book for one of my reading challenges… it’s not too late to join? hee hee).
The problem I have with libraries is not that they ban books but that they are so middlebrow in the books they select for us to read. The idea that you might go to the library for books you don’t have yourself and might want to reference is now completely foreign. I mostly only look at audiobooks and there are about 80% crime, romance and adventure. Of the six libraries I use only one has SF and only one the basic classics – Austen, Bronte(s), Dickens.
Of course we are hypersensitive these days to complaints from zionists, and library in Sydney is now in the news for removing a book with ‘Genocide’ in the title.
I loved Okorafor’s Lagoon. I can see I will have to obtain Laguardia. Though if she has moved away from Who Fears Death that’s a shame.
And of course speaking of zionists, Randah Abdul Fattah goes on being banned from literary festivals because, you know, she writes about being Palestinian in Australia.
True: I’m lucky to find one super chewy book on the new shelves at the library in large print; like the audio offerings, it’s mostly mysteries, thrillers, and self-help/pop-psychology (I do notice more romance in audio, but less in large print… does nobody dare to dream once their eyesight starts to fail?). And there are probably about twenty classics, traditional and modern, in the stacks in my branch; they don’t have their own section anymore. Having said that, there are other city branches with that kind of offering, so being able to request from their choices, without a fee, makes it workable.
The aliens in La Guardia are such fun: I really loved that concept. BUT I think you might be annoyed because, even though the stakes are high, it all feels a little… simple? It might be rather like that other novella you read not long ago (which I haven’t gotten to yet)-not Binti, but the other one.
I flagged a smart passage in Leanne Betasamosake Simpson’s theory of water about Gaza and Palestine the other night, underscoring the global efforts to displace Indigenous peoples (whether by settlers or other Indigenous peoples): I will have to remember to write about it here.
I have Iwaki Kei in my stack: have you read her?
The equivalents on my current stack might be the queer kids of the Heartstopper comics; the increasingly disabled mother in Elena Knows by Claudia Piñeiro; Suleika Jaouad, who’s in isolation to undergo intensive leukaemia treatment in Between Two Kingdoms; the Korean Americans (and autistic kids) in Miracle Creek by Angie Kim and To Grieve Is to Carry Another Time by Matthew Salesses; and the lodger with AIDS in The Nightingales by Emil Wilson. I bet they’d all have a fun party if they could get together!
Though I wonder how they could agree on a playlist! heheh I thought the depiction of her health struggles (In Elena Knows) were very realistic and affecting: to-the-point and unsentimental but moving. Angie Kim I’d like to read, and I’m curious about Mathhew Saleeses but I’ve only read his book on writing. I’m not sure about the last volume of Heartstopper; I read that she found it hard to write (in a way that reminded me of how L.M. Montgomery watned to retire Anne but readers just wanted more of Green Gables and were not prepread to let go) and maybe I would be satisfied to leave things where they are…
Books about outsiders, about people unlike us are so important. They give us insight into other lives and cultures, and should help us develop empathy. Banning is just going to make things worse…
I’m not sure that I believe those studies that say readers are more empathetic people, but I think it can happen. As a kid, reading about someone, who didn’t belong where they were either, was like having company…even if their the “reasons” they’d been pushed to the margins were different.
Great selection, some I knew and some I will explore further!
I know you were just about done with your TBR so that was lucky! /giggles
The only good thing to be said about book banning is that forbidding something always makes people want to do it more, particularly young people. We can only hope that they can get their hands on copies.
The stories about publishers who are partnering with Little Free Libraries throughout regions where access to queer narratives is being particularly limited… those are very encouraging.
All these book banning folks astonish me. Mostly because they believe, against all evidence, that restricting kids’ access to information will prevent them from having sex or expressing their gender identity. But also because they believe that they can stop kids from reading a book by banning it from the school library, when of course a far more effective method would be to put it on the school syllabus and make it required reading.
It baffles me that they don’t think back to how they behaved when they were young, as if that was some alien creature. The efforts of book-banners on the left in Ontario have also been disheartening, resulting in hundreds of books being pulled from library shelves because they were over ten years old (which not only pulls off all the classics, they’re looking at you Huck Finn etc., but will remove the modern classics like Angie Thomas’s The Heat U Give next year too, in 2027).