There’s that two-story brick building downtown on the corner—where family members bought my Great Aunt wedding gifts when she was a young married woman, where my mother bought her schoolbooks in grade thirteen, where I admired the Hummel figurines when I was a girl.
Over the decades, both name and ownership of that space changed many times—in that small city in dairy country, in tobacco country. But everyone still called it by the original name. All those layers of ordinary stories connected to it, between then and now, accumulated like the grit stuck to storm windows when you pull them out of storage to prepare for winter.
Susie Taylor’s Vigil (2024) explores that understanding of community over the course of seventeen linked stories: what’s lost, and what lingers, and what stays. How we hold and release, and how we relinquish and resist.
Bay Mal Verde in Newfoundland is the geographic setting for these stories, but anyone who’s grown up with hockey bags and seagulls, ATVs and Tim Hortons, will only need to add lupins and saltwater.
Taylor astutely captures the stifling loneliness that proliferates in small communities where difference is an insurmountable judgement.
Sometimes it’s obvious, as when a boy witnesses another boy “recover from more beatings, accidents, and humiliations that anyone else he knew.”
Mostly it permeates the collection in glimpses and details. The glow of a screen, blue in a house at night. A dealer telling a 15-year-old girl’s father that she owes $8K for drugs. A fake flower or strange-stuffed-animal keychain stuck into a chain-link fence behind the gas station.
Even Bay Mal Verde feels overshadowed, left at the alter to narrate the opening story: “There was a time when she herself was meant for greater things, until that sister of hers, St. John’s, started fluttering around and luring away all her suitors. Bay Mal Verde was left with a cathedral that sat on her hand like the engagement right form a called-off wedding. Expensive to insure with little resale value.”
Shifts in scale—from the settlement itself, to “a clump of boy” that “rolled around the neighbourhood together, to close single-voice narration like Ryan “walking onto a movie set of the biopic of his own life”—afford enough variation to create a sense of varied-but-connected experiences.
Shifts in time—a character dies in the second story, and two stories later is in the sixth grade—also secure that sense of a shared foundation. Landmarks and depots, desire paths and events: the residents of Bay Mal Verde are multi-dimensional and their perspectives are diverse, even as they navigate shared spaces and witness one another’s lives abruptly changing (or halting) or proceeding with deliberate-almost-painful sameness.
As readers progress through the collection, they slowly become immersed in the community as well (albeit in a come-from-away sense). And we recognise that Susie Taylor is providing just enough information about each character to afford readers to make their own evaluations and draw their own conclusions.
We can see who is lying, when she says she didn’t recognise the perp. We see someone see a body and keep the information quiet. We see a figure near the slushy machines and we’re not sure what to make of it either—whether it’s actually there, or just slushy fumes.
There’s a point in one story where a character breaks into a house by pulling at a rip in a window-screen and sliding into a basement window, cutting themselves in the course of events, noting the rend—noting that the pain from the rend hadn’t yet registered.
Susie Taylor’s storytelling resides in that space. Between the inevitable and the irretrievable, pain just a heartbeat apart.
She says: You know the place, where it is and what it’s called. I don’t have to explain that to you.

How I LOVED this book. I got to meet Susie Taylor when she came to Halifax for the book awards!
It’s a great one for anyone who enjoys linked stories, and it’s so fun you met her at the ceremony!
Oohhh this sounds like a great collection! I love it when these center on places, rather than particular people, but we have recurring characters still. It makes you really feel like you are getting to know a place.
Exactly: you feel like you’ve moved in, just temporarily!
I don’t read many short stories because I like longer pieces that stay in one place. This collection sounds interesting because it does just that. I like the quote you opened with because it reminded me of my small neighborhood grocery store that changed owners and names 3-4 times in the course of 10 years and yet James and I continued to call it by the original name when we moved to the neighborhood mostly because we couldn’t remember what it was called “now.” 😀 That last owners and name has stuck for close to 10 years now so we’ve managed to remember and call it by it’s current name.
Yes, exactly that. There is a similar neighbourhood grocery in one of the Toronto neighbourhoods that’s like that too. And the new names were all so similar that it was even harder to adjust. It’s not only a small-town phenomenon, good point.
If you enjoyed UKLG’s Searoad, it’s linked in a similar way. But maybe you’ve avoided that one, since you’re not so fond of short stories to start with? It was one of the collections that started to change my own thinking on stories, with its novelistic flavour.
Have you read much of Wendell Berry’s fiction? I have a copy of the first four in his cycle (also linked, also about community) on reserve and was trying to decide whether to take the plunge.
(PS I edited a weird space in your comment, JIC you-or anyone else- are/is wondering why it says this is edited!)
This does sound pretty fascinating–the quotes you give mark her as an impressive stylist.
That combination of clarity of expression with emotional complexity is very satisfying; it made it very hard to stick with my one story/day rule.
Like others here, I enjoy a link short story collection when it’s done well, which definitely seems to be true here. Olive Kitteridge came to mind as I was reading your review, especially Strout’s portrait of the community in Maine – and Kent Haruf’s Plainsong trilogy, too (albeit a series of novels rather than short stories).
I love Strout’s writing and have since Amy & Isabelle (even though we didn’t know she was busy establishing her links even then) but I have fallen behind. Now that I quite a few books behind, though, I think it’s “safe” to read another. Isn’t that ridiculous? Because they do stand up to rereading. But I also hate the idea of being without a “fresh” read from her pen. Haruf is a gap for me, but somehow I have always felt sure that I will love those books. (I think of him in the same breath as Jim Harrison and Jim Crace, but I’m not sure that’s entirely accurate. They’re also gaps, also books I believe will suit me well.)
This sounds excellent. I really like a linked short story collection.
It’s like the best of both bookish worlds, isn’t it!
I can never resist a linked short story collection, and rarely a small-town setting. (Any Elizabeth Strout vibes?)
Great question! Taylor’s style feels slightly more concrete, more matter-of-fact, but it’s not a world apart either. If Strout is a field of mixed vegetation, wild flowers and shrubs and cover, Taylor’s what grows up from the gravel alongside the railroad tracks. Similar components, different feel.
This sounds wonderful! Don’t we all know people who seem to be “walking onto a movie set of the biopic of his own life”.
I think you’d really appreciate this view of Newfoundland, recognising certain similarities from across the pond but also noting the distinct cultural elements…knowing how much you love linked stories too.