On the longlist, I’d read just four of the books when the nominees were announced, two last year and two this year.
For those who can forgive short stories for not being novels, Lisa Alward’s Cocktail will satisfy on many levels. She’s got the sharp observations of writers like Lauren Groff and Lorrie Moore, a poet’s focus on memorable images or scenes like Tracey Lindberg and Maxime Clair, and an affinity for women’s stories like Kali Fajardo-Anstine and katherena vermette.
I flagged passages in every single story and I warmed to the sense of an internal echo which seemed to pull a thread between the stories even though they aren’t technically linked. The title story, “Orlando 1974”, and “Bundle of Joy” resonated at a high pitch for me; I immediately thought of people with whom I wanted to share them.
“Don’t worry, he’d said, the grownups have it all under control, and even then, I’d known this for a lie. Yet when I was smashed, which was becoming more and more and more, those long fingers holding out the cherry seemed a hint of sweetness. And I wanted to suck every bit of sweet from my glass.”
Eleanor Catton’s Birnam Wood was a gift from Mr. BIP, who combed through Margaret Atwood’s tweets to find recent reading recommendations, which makes sense given its ecological themes and thinky-ness.
He’d forgotten that I’d dragged him (and oldest, then-somewhat-bookish step-kid) to a panel with Eleanor Catton when The Luminaries was everywhere. I’d forgotten how long The Luminaries was, which is also what made her feat of structure and her pleating of voices so impressive.
The beginning of Birnam Wood felt very long; I felt as though I’d be able to shop for every single character for their birthday gifts, so intricately were Catton’s characters established, developed. And, by beginning, I mean about 400 pages. I even queried a couple of bookfriends because I was starting to think I’d missed something. But, phew, after that point, there was no stopping me: I was smitten.
“Like all self-mythologising rebels, Mira preferred enemies to rivals, and often turned her rivals into enemies, the better to disdain them as secret agents of the status quo.”
Some of the ideas prominent in Birnam Wood are lurking beneath the surface of Catherine Leroux’s The Future (Trans. Susan Ouriou), a book I reviewed for prismInternational. This is the novel I was sure I would see on all the prizelists. [Edit: The review’s been published here.]
Leroux’s unconcerned with the details of what has already happened—a revolution and unrest, yes, and this is a post-industrial setting. It’s not quite our world, because present-day Detroit is Fort-Détroit in Leroux’s world and the idea of borders is just as hard to pin down as it was in the 19th century, when—as in our world—the French and English settlers fought for territory here disregarding the Indigenous inhabitants.
So it’s hardly relevant whether her ensemble cast is Canadian or American: everyone’s trying to survive in a world where resources are scarce so cooperation is essential.
“It’s one of those homes that forever brings vegetable stew to mind. The furniture, the rugs, the colour of the walls, everything hs a hint of stew, the very essence of stew. Comfort, force of habit, a certain blandness coupled with a feeling of safety.”
In The Future, Gloria arrives in Fort Détroit after her daughter’s been murdered, in pursuit of her granddaughters who have been missing since their mother’s death. Janika Oza’s A History of Burning has this kind of bold story driving it, and the story of inheritance also has nineteenth-century roots.
Oza’s style is rich and immersive, her storytelling sweeping. Her use of language and emotion is lavish and there were elements of this story which I absolutely loved.
Yet some aspects of her worldview are in-credible (i.e. not believable), usually circling around the idea of scale—what could/couldn’t have been felt back then as it is today, with our world now being made so small by technology. (A nineteenth-century boy in indentured servitude would not have had access to the images that constructed a dream of “reading beneath the polished white columns of a library somewhere, blundering with his friends in the mess halls” for instance.)
Nonetheless, whatever Oza writes next, I’ll be reading it, because with more experience (or a different kind of editorial support) she will be a real force.
“A railway the length of thousands of bodies, beneath it the ruins of other homes. The ashes of their ancestors united with the dirt, the land hatched with scars. The land—seized, unclaimable. Before them, somewhere waiting like a silent mouth.”
I was lucky to find copies of Anuja Varghese’s Chrysalis, V. V. Ganeshananthan’s Brotherless Night, Claudia Dey’s Daughter, Mona Susan Power’s A Council of Dolls fairly quickly after the longlist announcement. And Mr. BIP found Rebecca Makkai’s I Have Some Questions for You for me when he gave me Eleanor Catton’s book.
So I’ll write about some of these next week before the shortlist is announced. And, if I’m able to find copies of the others, I’ll write about them too.
As you already know, I love Cocktail and The Future. The Future has been doing so well, which makes me really happy for Catherine Leroux. And I’m happy for Lisa Alward, too, that her story collection is getting recognized. I could easily read those stories again.
I’m not sure I’m going to get to Birnam Wood – there are just so many other books to read!
Just a hunch, but I think OldestDaughter might actually really like Birnham Wood (with a warning that it’s a slow start). There are definitely some themes in there she’d enjoy, and the characters are all close in age and share some of her inclinations. Plus the last 120 pages or so…thrilling!
Lovely to read about these books, I haven’t really heard about this prize over here. I read and very much enjoyed The Luminaries, it was very long, but can’t decide if I would like Burnam Wood.
My hunch is that it might be better left for another time, especially when you’ve got so many other choices close at hand. I wonder if you ever watched the TV series of The Luminaries? I think it was broadcast over there originally?
It’s interesting to see what you say about the passing of Birnam Wood because I started listening to an abridged reading of it on BBC Radio 4’s Book at Bedtime, but it failed to garb me. Now I’m thinking I ought to have persisted with it…
I think I’d find it a challenge to listen to this (though sometimes the exact right narrator can conquer my reservations heheh) because I felt it very slow on the page, when I could put it down easily and switch to another book depending on mood; with audio, I feel like I have to listen in segments (or episodes, with BBC-ish productions) and that would emphasise the lengthy lead-up and heavy characterisation for me.
Ok this description of a house being a vegetable stew – YES!!! I feel this so strongly. I recognize that feeling of when I step into certain houses, but now I know what words to use to describe it – a vegetable stew house! I won’t use these words out loud mind you, the home owner may not get where I’m coming from…
Still – great quote!
It’s surprising to find a description like this in a dystopian novel, eh? But it’s also surprising to think that we live in a time when saying someone’s home smells like nourishing good could be taken the wrong way?! Is everyone’s house supposed to smell like potpourri? Or Febreeze? Or something else carcinogenic? Gah! How did that go so wrong.
I love that stew quote, too – it’s perfect for certain houses! And I love stew!
Right?! Have you never had a tasty pot of stew, Anne? Is this a Western Thing or an Anne Thing? /grins
[…] would you like to see on the shortlist? See Rebecca’s round-up post and Marcie’s round-up post as […]
Thanks so much for these thoughtful reflections on these books! I’ve added a History of Burning to my to-read list. I read Brotherless Night and unfortunately didn’t love it (gave it three stars) but curious what you make of it!
Thanks, Thomas. There’s a lot of ground in the like territory, when it comes to reading, so it could be that we end up meeting there. I did really love the first forty pages and then I reflected on the title, so now I’m approaching with caution (and wondering…why didn’t the title strike me that way initially).
Like you I enjoyed The luminaries, particularly for her ability to manage that structure and for the fun of unravelling the structure. I also thought there were some great ideas, and it was about a history that mirrored some of Australia’s gold rush history, but was New Zealand based that I didn’t know, but I didn’t love it. I have to say that everything I’ve heard about Birnam wood doesn’t compel me to read it. If my reading group wanted to read it I would do so and I’m sure I would get something out of it, but it’s just so long and no one really has praised it to the hilt.
I love that imagery of vegetable stew – comfortable but bland. What a great description – thanks for sharing that quote.
I do love how you write. This – “the sense of an internal echo which seemed to pull a thread between the stories even though they aren’t technically linked” – is perfect.
I get why The Luminaries doesn’t work for everyone; I also get why one of Catton’s novels might suffice. Years ago, I read The Rehearsal and thought it was delightfully complex too. (So long ago that I reference using a pay phone!) You know what mood to be in, to take a second look at her craft!
It’s an important quote to share, I think, because we often think that dystopian novels are one-note stories but Leroux’s novel sparks a variety of emotions. This would be a good book to pick up, if anyone wanted to try dystopian fiction but could feel their pulse racing at the mere thought of doing so. Aw, thanks WG: that’s kind of you to say.
I know just what moment in Cocktail reminded you of Lorrie Moore … or, at least, I have a guess! Two of the stories, “Old Growth” and “Bear Country,” are about the same characters, so there’s a linked pair, but I agree that the themes and tone connect the rest. We had the same favourite stories!
A History of Burning doesn’t sound like one for me.
I kept thinking that there must be more links; I was constantly flipping around to check characters’ names and details! It feels like a very unified collection. Not that collections must be, but I really loved these.
Some aspects of it were so enjoyable, but I wonder whether those elements might not seem overwritten for your reading taste: it’s probably just as well you focused on other nominees.
I thought Birnam Wood was just OK, I guess. It did take a while to get going for me as well, and then, while the plot at the end was pretty propulsive, I found the billionaire not entirely convincing–a bit too James-Bond-villain-ish.
The only other one I’ve read off the list at this point is the Rebecca Makkai, and I preferred the Catton to that. But both novels felt like a falling off compared the previous novel.
I felt that way too, partly because we really see him most often through the eyes of the resisters, but as the relationships between the group members deteriorated, and as more and more questions erupted about their moral/ethical choices (ahem, to put it lightly), then it started to seem like he was portrayed thinly on purpose, more to draw our attention to the inadequacy of that stereotype than to rely on it in the story.
I know what you mean: when you’ve really connected with an author’s previous novel it’s hard for the next book to be anything other than not-that-novel.
I also loved Birnam Wood, and am thinking I was right to skip A History of Burning…
I really loved Oza’s style and authoritative voice, especially with the opening chapters; it’s a fine line making historical settings/stories seem real for modern readers and having too much of a modern worldview seeping through and, for me, the contemporary-ish observations undermined credibility.
This is very good information to know about Birnam Wood when I get a chance to read it! I will expect a a long slow start but stick it out!
You can’t read a book again for the first time but, if I did, I would be able to know whether it’s because I expected more action and sooner because of The Luminaries or whether BW really does spend an inordinate amount of time spent creating the situation and building character.
I read The Luminaries (not knowing it was famous) and thought it stank. Sorry, but nothing I’ve read about Birnam Wood has made me want to give Catton a try.
Hah, well it doesn’t stink, but I see why it wouldn’t work for you, and it’s not a book I’d widely recommend either. I love the skill it took to write that book, but I didn’t love the characters or the story (a cut throat time and place) and that’s a deal-breaker for a lot (probably the majority?) of readers.